State v. Jordan

CourtListener 10154222Scctapp26 oct. 2011

Texte intégral

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT
BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE
268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Norwood Lee
Jordan, Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County

J. Michelle Childs, Circuit Court Judge

Opinion No. 2011-UP-474

Submitted October 1, 2011 – Filed October
26, 2011   

AFFIRMED

Appellate Defender M. Celia Robinson, of Columbia, for Appellant.

J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Norwood Lee Jordan appeals the circuit court's order revoking his
probation, arguing the circuit court erred in finding Jordan remained on
probation.  We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authority: State
v. Picklesimer, 388 S.C. 264, 270, 695 S.E.2d 845, 848 (2010) (explaining that
"successful completion" of a community supervision program requires
the completion of a maximum of two continuous years without any violations or
revocations).  

AFFIRMED.

FEW, C.J., THOMAS and KONDUROS, JJ.,
concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.