State v. Woods

CourtListener 10154210Scctapp31 oct. 2011

Texte intégral

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Donniel Woods, Appellant.

Appeal From Clarendon County

Clifton Newman, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-487

Submitted October 1, 2011 – Filed October
31, 2011   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert Pachak, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W.
Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Ernest A. Finney, III, of Sumter, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Donniel Woods appeals his convictions for first-degree
criminal sexual conduct, kidnapping, and strong armed robbery, arguing the
trial court erred in refusing to allow Woods to impeach the victim with a prior
bad act. After a thorough
review of the record, counsel's brief, and Woods's pro se brief pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1]  the appeal and grant
counsel's motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED. 

HUFF, PIEPER,
and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.