State v. Jeter

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Frederick Jeter, Appellant.

Appeal From Spartanburg County

E.C. Burnett, III, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2011-UP-394

Submitted August 11, 2011 – Filed August
18, 2011

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender M. Celia Robinson, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John
W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of
Columbia; and Solicitor Barry J. Barnette, of Spartanburg, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Frederick Jeter appeals his conviction
for distribution of crack cocaine.  On appeal, his counsel argues the trial
court erred in: (1) admitting evidence of an unredacted phone call in which a
police officer refers to crack cocaine and (2) admitting evidence of crack cocaine
where the solicitor failed to establish a complete chain of custody.  Additionally,
Jeter filed a pro se brief.  After a thorough review of the record and all briefs
pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v.
Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED. 

HUFF,
PIEPER, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.