Reaves v. Reaves

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

Willie D.
Reaves, Respondent,

v.

Franklin C. Reaves, Appellant.

Appeal From Marion County

 A. E. "Gene" Morehead, III,
Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-395

Submitted August 1, 2011 – Filed August 19,
2011  

AFFIRMED

Franklin C. Reaves, pro se, of Chadbourn, N.C., for Appellant.

Willie D. Reaves, pro se, of Mullins, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Franklin
C. Reaves appeals a family court order holding
him in civil contempt for failure to pay alimony.  We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1),
SCACR, and the following authorities:  Price v. Pickens Cnty., 308 S.C. 64, 67, 416 S.E.2d 666,
668 (Ct. App. 1992) ("The burden is on appellant to provide a sufficient
record such that this court can make an intelligent review."); Weston
v. Kim's Dollar Store, 385 S.C. 520, 538, 648 S.E.2d 769, 779 (Ct. App. 2009)
(finding that an appellate court is limited to facts appearing in the record
and will not address an argument in the absence of a record showing appellant
"raised to the [family] court the issues [he] now appeals."). 

AFFIRMED.

SHORT, WILLIAMS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.