CourtListener 10154144•State v. Leaphart
Texte intégral
THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Jeremy
Leaphart, Appellant.
Appeal From Lexington County
Robin B. Stilwell, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-256
Submitted May 1, 2011 Filed June 1, 2011
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender M. Celia Robinson, of
Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan M. Wilson, Chief
Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Attorney General Salley
W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Donald V. Myers, of Lexington, for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Jeremy Leaphart appeals his sentences, arguing they are
disproportionate to his crimes. After a thorough review of the record and counsel's
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]
APPEAL DISMISSED.
FEW, C.J., KONDUROS, J.,
and CURETON, A.J., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.