State v. Roger

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Jarvis Roper, Appellant.

Appeal From Charleston County

Roger M. Young, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-257

Submitted May 1, 2011 – Filed June 1, 2011   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender LaNelle Cantey Durant,
of Columbia, for Appellant

Attorney General Alan M. Wilson, Chief
Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Attorney General Salley
W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Scarlett Anne Wilson, of Charleston,
for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Jarvis Roper appeals his sentences, arguing the circuit court
relied on unsubstantiated facts outside the scope of his plea agreement.  After a thorough
review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

FEW, C.J., KONDUROS, J.,
and CURETON, A.J., concur. 

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.