State v. Cantrell

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

James Dean
Cantrell, Appellant.

Appeal From Anderson County

J.C. Buddy Nicholson, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-311

Submitted June 1, 2011 – Filed June 20,
2011

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender M. Celia Robinson, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

Assistant Chief Legal Counsel J. Benjamin
Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  James
Dean Cantrell appeals his probation revocation, arguing the trial court erred
in revoking his probation because his failure to complete a recommended drug
treatment program was the result of a misunderstanding.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel's
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED. 

FEW, C.J., PIEPER and
LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.