In the Interest of Keith W.

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

In the Interest
of Keith W.,

A minor under
the age of seventeen, Appellant.

Appeal From Cherokee County

Wesley L. Brown, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-324

Submitted June 1, 2011 – Filed June 22,
2011   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Eleanor Cleary Duffy, for
Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W.
Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Harold W. Gowdy, III, of Spartanburg, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Keith
W. appeals his conviction for indecent exposure, arguing the trial court erred
in failing to grant his motion for a directed verdict.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel's
brief, pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

FEW, C.J., LOCMEKY, J., 
and GOOLSBY, AJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.