CourtListener 10154077•State v. Johnson
Texte intégral
THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Calvin Jermaine
Johnson, Appellant.
Appeal From Anderson County
Alexander S. Macaulay, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-318
Submitted June 1, 2011 Filed June 22,
2011
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of
Columbia, for Appellant.
Assistant Chief Legal Counsel J. Benjamin
Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Calvin
Jermaine Johnson appeals his probation revocation, arguing the trial court
erred in refusing to consider the fact that the victim was contacting Johnson
and his family. After a thorough
review of the record, counsel's brief, and Johnson's pro se brief, pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to
be relieved.[1]
APPEAL DISMISSED.
FEW, C.J., PIEPER and
LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.