State v. Shepherd

CourtListener 10154061Scctapp28 juin 2011

Texte intégral

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Roger Shepherd, Appellant.

Appeal From Pickens County

G. Edward Welmaker, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-337 

Submitted June 1, 2011 – Filed June 28,
2011

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan M. Wilson, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley
W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor William W. Wilkins, III, of
Greenville, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Roger
Shepherd appeals his conviction for armed robbery, assault with intent to kill,
murder, and possession of a weapon during the commission of a crime, arguing
the trial court erred in giving an incorrect malice charge.  After a thorough
review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF and KONDUROS, JJ., and
GOOLSBY, A.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.