CourtListener 10154053•State v. Dennis
Texte intégral
THIS OPINION
HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN
ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Adarius Quante
Dennis, Appellant.
Appeal From Oconee County
Alexander S. Macaulay, Circuit Court
Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-352
Submitted June 1, 2011 Filed June 29,
2011
AFFIRMED
Appellate Defender Elizabeth A.
Franklin-Best, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan M. Wilson, Chief
Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General
Salley W. Elliott, and Assistant Attorney General Christina J. Catoe, all of
Columbia; and Solicitor Christina T. Adams, of Anderson, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Adarius
Quante Dennis appeals his sentence for armed robbery, arguing the circuit court
abused its discretion when it penalized him for exercising his right to a
trial. We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authority: State v.
Johnson, 333 S.C. 459, 462, 510 S.E.2d 423, 425 (1999) (holding that,
except in exceptional circumstances, "a challenge to sentencing must be
raised at trial, or the issue will not be preserved for appellate review").
AFFIRMED.
FEW, C.J., HUFF, J., and
GOOLSBY, A.J., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.