SCDSS v. M.C.

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina
Department of Social Services, Respondent,

v.

M.C. and
E.C.C., Jr., Defendants,

Of whom M.C. is
the Appellant,

v.

and E.C.C., Jr.
is the Respondent.

In the
interest of three minors under the age of 18.

Appeal From Oconee County

Timothy M. Cain, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-247  

Submitted May 1, 2011 – Filed May 24, 2011

AFFIRMED

Keith G. Denny and Bradley A. Norton, both of Walhalla, for
Appellant.

Amy E. Shelley, of Greenville, for Respondent E.C.C., Jr.

Kimberly Renae Welchel, of Walhalla, for Respondent South Carolina
Department of Social Services.

John Frederic Prescott, Jr., of Walhalla, for Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: M.C. appeals
from the family court's final order terminating her parental rights to her
minor child.  See S.C.
Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (2010).  Upon a thorough review of the record and the
family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex Parte
Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues
warrant briefing.  Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling.

AFFIRMED.[1]

WILLIAMS and
KONDUROS, JJ., and CURETON, A.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.