SCDSS v. Matina N.

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina
Department of Social Services, Respondent,

   v.

Matina N. and
Carnell N., Appellants,

In the interest of three minor children under the age of 18.

Appeal From Aiken County

Peter R. Nuessle, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-135

Submitted April 1, 2011 – Filed April 5,
2011   

AFFIRMED

A. Christy Tyner, of Aiken, for Appellant
Matina N.

Mark L. Wilhelmi, of Augusta, Georgia, for
Appellant Carnell N.

Dennis Gmerek, of Aiken, for Respondent.

Patrick McWilliams, of Aiken, Guardian ad
Litem.

PER CURIAM: Matina N. and Carnell N. both appeal from the family court's final order terminating
their parental rights to their minor children.  See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (2010).  Upon a
thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of fact and
conclusions of law pursuant to Ex Parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354
S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing. 
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling.

AFFIRMED.[1]

WILLIAMS and KONDUROS,
JJ., and CURETON, A.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.