In the Interest of Quavious R.

CourtListener 10153919Scctapp28 avr. 2011

Texte intégral

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

In The Interest
of Quavious R., A Minor Under The Age Of Seventeen, Appellant.

Appeal From Darlington County

Jamie Lee Murdock, Jr., Family Court
Judge

Peter Fuge, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-193

Submitted April 1, 2011 – Filed April 28,
2011   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W.
Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor William B. Rogers, Jr., of Bennettsville,
for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Quavious R. appeals his commitment to the Department
of Juvenile Justice for an indeterminate time not to exceed his twenty-first
birthday after being found delinquent for second-degree burglary, arguing the
trial court erred in denying his directed verdict motion.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel's
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, SHORT, and PIEPER,
JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.