SCDSS v. Ruth P.

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina
Department of Social Services, Respondent,

   v.

Ruth P., Corey
P., and John Doe, Defendants,

Of whom Ruth P.
is the Appellant.

In the interest of two minor children under the age of 18.

In the interest of two minor children under the age of 18.

Appeal From Berkeley County

Jack A. Landis, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-051

Submitted February 1, 2011 – Filed
February 4, 2011   

AFFIRMED

J. Jay Hulst, of Moncks Corner, for
Appellant.

Wolfgang Louis Kelly, of Moncks Corner,
for Respondent.

Sean F. Keefer and Revonda Hardesty, both of
Moncks Corner, for Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Ruth P. appeals from the family court's final order terminating her parental
rights to her minor children.  S.C.
Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (2010).  Upon a thorough review of the record and the
family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex Parte
Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues
warrant briefing.  Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling.

AFFIRMED.[1]

WILLIAMS and
KONDUROS, JJ., and CURETON, A.J., concur.        

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.