Cantrell v. Carter

THIS OPINION
HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN
ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

Carlton E.
Cantrell, Appellant,

v.

Aiken County,
Aiken County Animal Control Director, Shirley Hardin, Aiken County Animal
Control Officer Bobby Arthurs, and Judge Charles T. Carter, Defendants,

Of whom Judge
Charles T. Carter is the Respondent.

Appeal From Aiken County

 Doyet A. Early, III, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-533

Submitted December 1, 2010 – Filed
December 14, 2010

AFFIRMED

Carlton Cantrell, pro se, for Appellant.

James M. Holly, of Aiken, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Carlton
E. Cantrell appeals the trial court's order granting summary judgment in favor
of Magistrate Judge Charles T. Carter.  The trial court found Carter's
complaint contained no allegation whatsoever concerning Carter, and even if it
did, Carter was acting in his official capacity and therefore immune from
liability.  We affirm[1] pursuant
to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authority: State v. Howard,
384 S.C. 212, 217, 682 S.E.2d 42, 45 (Ct. App. 2009) ("An issue is deemed
abandoned and will not be considered on appeal if the argument is raised in a
brief but not supported by authority.").

AFFIRMED.

HUFF, KONDUROS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.