State v. White

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Joseph M.
White, Appellant.

Appeal From Lexington County

R. Knox McMahon, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2010-UP-540 

Submitted November 1, 2010 – Filed
December 16, 2010

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert Pachak, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief
Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General
Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Donald V. Myers, of
Lexington, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Joseph M. White appeals his conviction
for possession with intent to distribute crack cocaine and possession of crack
cocaine in proximity of a school or park.  On appeal, White argues the trial
court erred in admitting testimony of two narcotics officers when they lacked
reasonable suspicion to seize him.  After a thorough review of the record and
counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),
and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss
the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

THOMAS,
PIEPER, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.