State v. Shabazz, Shazjuan

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Shazjuan S. Shabazz, Appellant

Appeal From Pickens County

Larry R. Patterson, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2010-UP-490

Submitted November 1, 2010 – November 4,
2010

APPEAL DISMISSED

Senior Appellate Defender Joseph L.
Savitz, III, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster,
Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney
General Salley W. Elliot, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Robert M. Ariail, of Greenville,
for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Shazjuan
S. Shabazz appeals his conviction for first-degree criminal sexual conduct and
kidnapping.  His counsel argues the trial court erred in admitting a hearsay
statement and denying his motion for a new trial.  Additionally, Shabazz filed
a pro se brief.  After a thorough review of the record and both briefs
pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v.
Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED. 

THOMAS, PIEPER, and
GEATHERS, JJ., concur. 

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.