CourtListener 10153657•State v. Walker, Travis
Texte intégral
THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Travis Marquis Walker, Appellant.
Appeal From York County
Larry B. Hyman, Jr., Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-453
Submitted October 1, 2010 Filed October
21, 2010
APPEAL DISMISSED
Senior Appellate Defender Joseph L.
Savitz, III, of Columbia, for Appellant.
J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Travis
Marquis Walker appeals his probation revocation, arguing the revocation hearing
was so summary that his revocation should be reversed. After a thorough review of the record and counsel's
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.
APPEAL
DISMISSED.
SHORT, THOMAS,
and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.