State v. Bailey

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Michael Adam Bailey, Appellant.

Appeal From Horry County

 James E. Lockemy, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2010-UP-306

Submitted June 1, 2010  - Filed June 10,
2010

AFFIRMED

Senior Appellate Defender Joseph L. Savitz, III, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, and
Assistant Attorney General J. Anthony Mabry, all of Columbia; and Solicitor
John Gregory Hembree, of Conway, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: 
Michael Adam Bailey was convicted of murder and sentenced to thirty years'
imprisonment.  He appeals, arguing the trial
court erred in allowing three key witnesses to testify they agreed to take
polygraph examinations.  We
affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and
the following authorities:  State v.
Dunbar, 356 S.C. 138, 142, 587 S.E.2d 691, 693-94 (2003) ("In order for an issue to be preserved for appellate review, it
must have been raised to and ruled upon by the trial judge."); Id. ("Issues not raised and ruled upon in the trial
court will not be considered on appeal.").

AFFIRMED.

HUFF,
SHORT, and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.