State v. Short

THIS OPINION
HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN
ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

David Wayne
Short, Appellant.

Appeal From Darlington County

 James E. Lockemy, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-311

Submitted June 1, 2010 – Filed June 15,
2010

Affirmed

Appellate Defender M. Celia Robinson, of Columbia, for Appellant.

J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  David Wayne Short appeals the revocation
of his probation arguing the imposition of a further term of community
supervision violated his right to due process and deprived him of the
constitutional protections guaranteed all criminal defendants.  We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the
following authority: See State v. Shumate, 276 S.C. 46, 47, 275 S.E.2d
288, 288 (1981) (holing a defendant's failure "to object to or seek modification of the revocation
sentence in the trial court" precludes challenging the sentence on
appeal).

Affirmed.

FEW, C.J., WILLIAMS, J., and CURETON, A.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.