State v. William Brewster

CourtListener 10153416Scctapp8 mars 2010

Texte intégral

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

William H. Brewster, Appellant.

Appeal From York County

Brooks P. Goldsmith, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-193

Submitted March 1, 2010 – Filed March 8,
2010

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief
Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General
Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Kevin Scott Brackett, of
York, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  William
H. Brewster pled no contest to possession of a stolen vehicle and failure to
stop for a blue light.  He appeals, arguing the plea was rendered involuntary
by the plea court's failure to explain his right to grand jury presentment.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel's
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED. 

PIEPER and GEATHERS, JJ.,
and CURETON, A.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.