State v. Williams

THIS OPINION
HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN
ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Charles
Williams, Appellant.

Appeal From Oconee County

 Alexander S. Macaulay, Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2010-UP-221

Submitted  March 1,2010 – Filed March 29,
2010

Affirmed

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, Assistant
Attorney General Michelle J. Parsons, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Christina
T. Adams, of Anderson, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Charles Williams appeals his convictions for second
degree criminal sexual conduct with a minor and lewd act upon a minor. 
Williams argues the trial court erred in allowing the admission of his
statement indicating he fondled and rubbed the victim.  We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the
following authority: State v. Burton, 326 S.C. 605, 613, 486 S.E.2d 762, 765 (Ct.
App. 1997) (finding in camera admissibility ruling insufficient to preserve
issue for appeal where testimony from two witnesses was presented, a break was
taken after the ruling and before the testimony at issue was presented, and
defendant failed to contemporaneously object). 

Affirmed.

SHORT, WILLIAMS, and
lOCKEMY, jj., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.