State v. Elaine Curry

THIS OPINION
HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN
ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Elaine Floyd
Curry, Appellant.

Appeal From York County

R. Knox McMahon, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-073

Submitted January 4, 2010 – Filed February
1, 2010   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H.
Carter, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief
Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General
Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Kevin Scott Brackett, of York,
for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Elaine
Floyd Curry appeals her conviction for
resisting arrest, arguing the arrest on which the charge against her was based
was not lawful.  Curry's counsel attached
a petition to be relieved as counsel, stating that she reviewed the record and
concluded the appeal lacked merit.  After a review of the record and counsel's
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Curry's appeal
and grant counsel's petition to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

SHORT, THOMAS, and
KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case
without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.