State v. Cedric Saunders

CourtListener 10153375Scctapp2 févr. 2010

Texte intégral

THIS OPINION
HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN
ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Cedric
Saunders, Appellant.

Appeal From Beaufort County

R. Knox McMahon, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-079

Submitted January 4, 2010 – Filed February
2, 2010   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief
Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General
Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Issac McDuffie Stone, III, of
Beaufort for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Cedric
Saunders pled guilty to possession of a stolen firearm, possession of a firearm
during the commission of a violent offense, and two counts of murder.  On
appeal, Saunders argues the trial court erred in imposing the maximum sentence
without considering Saunder's low IQ and borderline mental retardation.  After a thorough review of the record, Saunders's pro se
brief and counsel's brief, pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991),
we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's petition to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED. 

SHORT, THOMAS, and
KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.