State v. Noah Chappell

CourtListener 10153348Scctapp4 févr. 2010

Texte intégral

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Noah D.
Chappell, Appellant.

Appeal from Greenville County

C. Victor Pyle, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-097

Submitted January 4, 2010 – Filed February
4, 2010  

APPEAL DISMISSED

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H.
Carter, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster,
Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney
General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; Solicitor Robert M. Ariall, of
Greenville, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Noah D. Chappell appeals his convictions and sentences
for possession of a pistol by a person convicted of a violent crime, possession
or use of body armor by a violent offender, and the unlawful carrying of a pistol.
Chappell argues the trial court erred in ending jury selection and beginning
empanelling a new jury due to strikes made in violation of Batson v. Kentucky,
476 U.S. 79 (1989).  Chappell filed a separate pro se brief arguing the trial
court erred in denying his motion for a directed verdict.  After a thorough review of the record, and
both briefs, pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

WILLIAMS, PIEPER, and Lockemy, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.