State v. Robert Grant

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Robert S. Grant, Appellant.

Appeal from Greenville County

Edward W. Miller, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-105

Submitted January 4, 2010 – Filed February
4, 2010   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia,
for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster,
Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney
General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia, and Solicitor Robert M. Ariail, of
Greenville, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Robert S. Grant appeals his conviction
and sentence for distribution of crack cocaine and possession with intent to
distribute within proximity of a school. On
appeal, counsel maintains the trial court erred in refusing to charge the jury
on mere presence.  Grant also filed a pro se brief.  After a thorough review of the record,
counsel’s brief, and Grant's pro se brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

WILLIAMS,
PIEPER, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.