State v. Randolph Freeman

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Randolph Scott Freeman, Appellant.

Appeal From Pickens County

D. Garrison Hill, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion
No. 2010-UP-116

Submitted January
4, 2010 – Filed February 11, 2010   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster,
Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney
General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Robert M. Ariail, of
Greenville, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Randolph Scott Freeman was convicted of indecent
exposure and sentenced to three years' imprisonment concurrent to his revoked
probationary sentence.  Freeman appeals arguing the trial court erred in
allowing the deaf victim to use an unqualified interpreter.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel's
brief, pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED. 

WILLIAMS,
PIEPER, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.