CourtListener 10153304•State v. Danzell Morris
Texte intégral
this Opinion Has No Precedential Value. It Should not be cited or
relied on as precedent in any proceeding except as provided by rule 268(d)(2),
scacr.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State,
Respondent,
v.
Danzell Morris,
Appellant.
__________
Appeal From Horry County
Steven H. John, Circuit Court Judge
__________
Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-148
Submitted January 4, 2010 Filed February
23, 2010
__________
Appeal Dismissed
__________
Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief
Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General
Salley W. Elliott, of Columbia; and Solicitor John Gregory Hembree, of Conway,
for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Danzell Morris appeals his convictions
for possession of cocaine base, possession of Demerol, and possession of Xanax.
Morris asserts the court erred in denying his motion for a directed verdict.
After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Morris's appeal and grant counsel's motion
to be relieved.[1]
appeal dismissed.
SHORT, THOMAS, and
KONDUROS, JJ., concur.
[1]
We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.