SC DSS v. Wanda M.

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina
Department of Social Services, Respondent,

v.

Wanda M. and John
Doe, Defendants.

Of Whom Wanda
M. is the Appellant.

In the Interest
of E.M., a Minor Child under the age of 18.

Appeal From Clarendon County

Robert S. Armstrong, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-004

Submitted December 1, 2009 – Filed January
12, 2010   

Affirmed

Charles Thomas Brooks, of Sumter, for
Appellant.

Cherolyn Roselle Allen, of Manning, for
Respondent.

Tara A. Leaphart, of Manning, for Guardian
Ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Wanda M. appeals the family court's order
terminating her parental rights to her minor child.  See S.C. Code Ann.
§ 63-7-2570 (2008).  Upon a thorough review of the record and the family
court's findings of fact and conclusions of law, pursuant to Ex Parte
Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues
warrant briefing.  Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling.  

AFFIRMED.[1]

WILLIAMS, KONDUROS, JJ.,
and CURETON, A.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.