In The Interest Of David Tyler S

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d) (2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

In The Interest
Of David Tyler S., A Juvenile Under The Age Of Seventeen, Appellant.

Appeal From Anderson County

Timothy L. Brown, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-043

Submitted January 4, 2010 – January 26,
2010   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H.
Carter, South Carolina Commission on Indigent Defense, Division of Appellate
Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley
W. Elliott, Office of the Attorney General, of Columbia, Christina Theos Adams,
of Anderson, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  In March of 2008, David S., a minor
under the age of seventeen, was sentenced to ninety days and nine months
probation with the ninety days suspended for simple possession of marijuana, simple
assault and battery and use of a vehicle without owner's permission.  Following
a probation revocation hearing, the court revoked David S.'s suspended
sentence.  David S.'s counsel attached to the brief a petition to be relieved
as counsel, stating that she had reviewed the record and concluded this appeal
lacks merit.  David S. did not file a pro se brief. 

After a thorough
review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss[1] the appeal and grant counsel's petition to be relieved.

APPEAL
DISMISSED

HUFF, A.C.J.,
GEATHERS, J., and CURETON, A.J., concur.

[1] We decide this
case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.