SCDSS v. Ashley Nicole Ortega-Smith

CourtListener 10152858Scctapp29 nov. 2023

Texte intégral

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,

v.

Ashley Nicole Ortega-Smith and Gregory Smith, Jr.,
Defendants,

Of whom Ashley Nicole Ortega-Smith is the Appellant.

In the interest of a minor under the age of 18.

Appellate Case No. 2023-001161

Appeal From Oconee County
Karen F. Ballenger, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2023-UP-379
Submitted November 13, 2023 – Filed November 29, 2023

AFFIRMED

Robert Mills Ariail, Jr., of Law Office of R. Mills Ariail,
Jr., of Greenville, for Appellant.

Andrew Troy Potter, of Anderson, for Respondent.
Kimberly Welchel Pease, of Kimberly R. Welchel,
Attorney At Law, of Seneca, for the Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Ashley Nicole Ortega-Smith appeals the family court's final
order terminating her parental rights to her minor child. See S.C. Code Ann.
§ 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2023). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family
court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291
S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling.

AFFIRMED. 1

THOMAS, KONDUROS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.