State v. Joey C. Reid

CourtListener 10152807Scctapp20 sept. 2023

Texte intégral

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Appellant,

v.

Joey Corvell Reid, Respondent.

Appellate Case No. 2021-001465

Appeal From Greenwood County
Frank R. Addy, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2023-UP-311
Submitted September 13, 2023 – Filed September 20, 2023

APPEAL DISMISSED

Matthew C. Buchanan, of South Carolina Department of
Probation, Parole, and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

Appellate Defender David Alexander, of Columbia, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM: The State appeals an order of the circuit court that found Joey
Corvell Reid's sentence was illegal, and thus, his probation should not be revoked.
The order also vacated Reid's illegal sentence and ordered resentencing. On
appeal, the State argues the circuit court erred because (1) one judge cannot vacate
a sentencing order issued by another circuit judge when there was no appeal taken
from the original sentence and (2) Reid's sentence, which was not appealed, was
law of the case even though not permitted by statute. We dismiss on the basis the
order is not immediately appealable.

On January 27, 2014, Reid pled guilty pursuant to a negotiated plea to first-degree
assault and battery and attempted murder. The plea court accepted the negotiated
plea and sentenced Reid to ten years' imprisonment on the assault charge and
twenty years' imprisonment, suspended to five years' probation, on the attempted
murder charge. Reid served his active sentence and was released on probation in
2018. Subsequently, the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and
Pardon Services issued a warrant for violation of the terms of probation.
Following the probation violation hearing, the circuit court, in its order, found a
conviction for attempted murder could not be suspended to probation, regardless of
the fact that it was a negotiated plea, and determined that because the attempted
murder sentence was illegal, Reid's probation should not be revoked. See S.C.
Code Ann. § 16-3-29 ("A person who, with intent to kill, attempts to kill another
person with malice aforethought, either expressed or implied, commits the offense
of attempted murder. . . . A sentence imposed pursuant to this section may not be
suspended nor may probation be granted." (emphasis added)). The court,
concluding that Reid's probationary sentence was "illusory and of no practical
effect," then vacated Reid's attempted murder sentence and ordered resentencing.
Because the order is not final until after Reid has been resentenced and no
subsection of section 14-3-330 of the South Carolina Code (2017) is applicable, we
dismiss the order as not immediately appealable. See Ex parte Wilson, 367 S.C. 7,
13, 625 S.E.2d 205, 208 (2005) ("Absent some specialized statute, the immediate
appealability of an interlocutory or intermediate order depends on whether the
order falls within [section] 14-3-330.").

APPEAL DISMISSED. 1

WILLIAMS, C.J., and HEWITT and VERDIN, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.