SCDSS v. Green

CourtListener 10152776Scctapp18 août 2023

Texte intégral

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,

v.

Eyvonne Green, Elliot Humes, and John Doe,
Defendants,

Of whom Eyvonne Green is the Appellant.

In the interests of minors under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2023-000596

Appeal From Clarendon County
Thomas M. Bultman, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2023-UP-296
Submitted August 3, 2023 – Filed August 18, 2023

AFFIRMED

Harry A. Hancock, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Christopher Craig Jackson, of Chris Jackson Law Firm
LLC, of Mauldin, for Respondent.
Lauren Felder Shaw, of Lauren F. Shaw Law, of Sumter,
for the Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Eyvonne Green appeals the family court's final order terminating
her parental rights to her minor children. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (Supp.
2022). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of
fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354
S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing. Accordingly,
we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Green's counsel.

AFFIRMED.1

WILLIAMS, C.J., and HEWITT and VERDIN, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.