Johnny N. Gregg v. State of South Carolina

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

Johnny N. Gregg, Petitioner,

v.

State of South Carolina, Respondent.

Appellate Case No. 2020-001491

Appeal From Florence County
D. Craig Brown, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2022-UP-342
Submitted August 11, 2022 – Filed August 17, 2022

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Taylor Davis Gilliam, of Columbia,
for Petitioner.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant
Attorney General D. Russell Barlow, II, both of
Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Petitioner seeks a writ of certiorari from the denial of his
application for post-conviction relief (PCR). Because there is sufficient evidence
to support the PCR court's finding that Petitioner did not knowingly and
intelligently waive his right to a direct appeal, we grant certiorari on Petitioner's
Question One pursuant to White v. State, 263 S.C. 110, 208 S.E.2d 35 (1974), and
proceed with our review of the direct appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). We deny certiorari on Petitioner's Question Two.

After review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), this appeal is
dismissed. Counsel's motion to be relieved as counsel for the direct appeal is
granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED. 1

WILLIAMS, C.J., THOMAS, J., and LOCKEMY, A.J., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.