SCDSS v. Savannah Rhinehart

CourtListener 10152286Scctapp21 avr. 2022

Texte intégral

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,

v.

Savannah Rhinehart, Nicholas Rash, and John Doe,
Defendants,

Of whom Savannah Rhinehart is the Appellant.

In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2021-001085

Appeal From Union County
Debra A. Matthews, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2022-UP-178
Submitted April 14, 2022 – Filed April 21, 2022

AFFIRMED

Alexandria Marie Wolf, of Callie A. Charles, LLC, of
Beaufort, for Appellant.

Shawn M. Campbell, of Campbell Law Offices, of
Spartanburg, as the Guardian ad Litem for Appellant.
Charleka LeTay Hannon, of South Carolina Department
of Social Services, of Union, for Respondent.

Jonathan Drew Hammond, of Greenville, for the
Guardian ad Litems for the children.

PER CURIAM: Savannah Rhinehart appeals the family court's final order
terminating her parental rights to her minor children. See S.C. Code Ann.
§ 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2021). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family
court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291
S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Rhinehart's counsel.

AFFIRMED.1

GEATHERS and HILL, JJ., and LOCKEMY, A.J., concur.

1
We decide this case without argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.