State v. Douglas Lavance Young

CourtListener 10152184Scctapp9 févr. 2022

Texte intégral

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Douglas Lavance Young, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2019-002034

Appeal From Charleston County
Edgar W. Dickson, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2022-UP-041
Submitted January 1, 2022 – Filed February 9, 2022

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Adam Sinclair Ruffin, of Columbia,
and Douglas L. Young, pro se, both for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown,
both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED.1

KONDUROS, HILL, and HEWITT, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.