Dustin Cain Sisk v. Moriah S. Bowie

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

Dustin Cain Sisk, Stephanie Annette Sisk, and South
Carolina Department of Social Services, Respondents,

v.

Moriah S. Bowie and Barry Bowie, Defendants,

Of whom Moriah S. Bowie is the Appellant.

In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2021-000224

Appeal From Greenwood County
Matthew P. Turner, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2022-UP-079
Submitted February 9, 2022 – Filed February 14, 2022

AFFIRMED

Michael Stephen Gambrell, of Michael S. Gambrell,
LLC, of Greenville, for Appellant.

Jane Hawthorne Merrill, of Hawthorne Merrill Law,
LLC, of Greenwood, as the Guardian ad Litem for
Appellant.
James Fletcher Thompson, of Thompson Dove Law
Group LLC, of Spartanburg, for Respondents Dustin
Cain Sisk and Stephanie Annette Sisk.

Sarah M. Coldiron, of South Carolina Department of
Social Services, of Newberry; and Dottie C. Ingram,
South Carolina Department of Social Services, of
Greenville, both for Respondent South Carolina
Department of Social Services.

Carson McCurry Henderson, of The Henderson Law
Firm, PC, of Greenwood, for the Guardian ad Litem for
the children.

PER CURIAM: Moriah S. Bowie appeals the family court's final order
terminating her parental rights to her minor children. See S.C. Code Ann.
§ 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2021). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family
court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291
S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Bowie's counsel.

AFFIRMED.1

THOMAS, MCDONALD, and HEWITT, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.