State v. Tequan M. Holmes

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Tequan Martrell Holmes, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2019-001313

Appeal From Aiken County
Thomas W. Cooper, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2021-UP-407
Submitted November 1, 2021 – Filed November 17, 2021

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Adam Sinclair Ruffin, of Columbia,
and Tequan Martrell Holmes, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown,
both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED.1

HUFF, THOMAS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.