Antonio D. Young

CourtListener 10151774Scctapp10 mars 2021

Texte intégral

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of Antonio D.
Young, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2019-000823

Appeal From Charleston County
R. Ferrell Cothran, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2021-UP-068
Submitted January 1, 2021 – Filed March 10, 2021

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia; and
Antonio D. Young, pro se, both for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Deborah R.J. Shupe,
both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.1

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
APPEAL DISMISSED.

LOCKEMY, C.J., and KONDUROS and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.