SCDSS v. Price

CourtListener 10151544Scctapp3 août 2020

Texte intégral

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,

v.

Wanda D. Price and Joshua T. Johnson, Defendants,

Of whom Joshua T. Johnson is the Appellant.

In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2019-001953

Appeal From Anderson County
Karen S. Roper, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2020-UP-230
Submitted July 24, 2020 – Filed August 3, 2020

AFFIRMED

Kimberly Yancey Brooks, of Kimberly Y. Brooks,
Attorney at Law, of Greenville, for Appellant.

Andrew Troy Potter, of Potter Law, LLC, and Brittany
Dreher Senerius, of South Carolina Department of Social
Services, both of Anderson, for Respondent.
John Marshall Swails, Jr., of Greenville, for the Guardian
ad Litem for the minor children.

Robert Mills Ariail, Jr., of Law Office of R. Mills Ariail,
Jr., of Greenville, Guardian ad Litem for the appellant.

PER CURIAM: Joshua T. Johnson appeals the family court's final order
terminating his parental rights to his minor children. See S.C. Code Ann.
§ 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2019). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family
court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291
S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Johnson's counsel.

AFFIRMED.1

HUFF, THOMAS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.