State v. Flowers

CourtListener 10151502Scctapp1 juil. 2020

Texte intégral

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Laparis Shmel Flowers, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2018-000099

Appeal From Allendale County
Perry M. Buckner, III, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2020-UP-207
Submitted June 1, 2020 – Filed July 1, 2020

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Taylor Davis Gilliam, of Columbia,
and Laparis Shmel Flowers, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown,
both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

LOCKEMY, C.J., and GEATHERS, and HEWITT, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.