Morgan v. Boyles

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

Carmen Morgan, Appellant,

v.

Yvonne Murray Boyles, Respondent.

Appellate Case No. 2018-001809

Appeal From Richland County
Paul M. Burch, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2020-UP-177
Submitted May 1, 2020 – Filed June 10, 2020

APPEAL DISMISSED

Carmen Morgan, pro se, of Columbia.

Yvonne Murray Boyles, pro se, of Columbia.

PER CURIAM: Carmen Morgan appeals the circuit court's order affirming the
decision of the Resolution of Fee Disputes Board (the Board). Because this court
lacks appellate jurisdiction over appeals from decisions of the Board, this appeal is
dismissed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: Rule
416, SCACR, Rule 20 (stating a "party aggrieved by the final decision of the Board
may appeal the decision to the circuit court in the county where the principal place
of practice of the attorney is located"); Wright v. Dickey, 370 S.C. 517, 521, 636
S.E.2d 1, 3 (Ct. App. 2006) (concluding "there is no appeal from a decision of the
Resolution of Fee Disputes Board of the South Carolina Bar beyond the circuit
court as set forth in Rule 416, SCACR, Rule 20").

APPEAL DISMISSED.1

WILLIAMS, KONDUROS, and HILL, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.