State v. Abdullah

CourtListener 10151219Scctapp31 déc. 2019

Texte intégral

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Muttaqin Fatir Abdullah, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2016-002217

Appeal From Sumter County
D. Craig Brown, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2019-UP-406
Submitted November 1, 2019 – Filed December 31, 2019

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Adam Sinclair Ruffin, of Columbia,
and Muttaqin Fatir Abdullah, pro se.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown,
of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted. 1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

SHORT, THOMAS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.