State v. Canfield

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Clifford Dean Canfield, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2016-002574

Appeal From York County
John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2019-UP-404
Submitted November 1, 2019 – Filed December 31, 2019

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Taylor Davis Gilliam, of Columbia;
and Clifford Dean Canfield, pro se, for Appellant.

Matthew C. Buchanan, of the South Carolina Department
of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia,
for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted. 1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

SHORT, THOMAS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.