State v. Campbell

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Robert Bernard Campbell, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2016-002457

Appeal From Greenville County
R. Keith Kelly, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2019-UP-332
Submitted September 1, 2019 – Filed October 9, 2019

AFFIRMED

Appellate Defender Joanna Katherine Delany, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant
Attorney General Mark Reynolds Farthing, both of
Columbia; and Solicitor William Walter Wilkins, III, of
Greenville, all for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following
authorities: State v. Slocumb, 426 S.C. 297, 314-15, 827 S.E.2d 148, 157 (2019)
("Neither Graham[1] nor the Eighth Amendment . . . currently prohibits the
imposition of aggregate sentences for multiple offenses amounting to a de facto
life sentence on a juvenile nonhomicide offender."); State v. Finley, 427 S.C. 419,
427, 831 S.E.2d 158, 162 (Ct. App. 2019) ("[A juvenile offender] is not entitled to
resentencing pursuant to Miller and Byars . . . . [when his] sentence afforded [him]
parole eligibility . . . .").

AFFIRMED.2

SHORT, THOMAS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

1
Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48 (2010).
2
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.