State v. Duncan

CourtListener 10150954Scctapp20 mars 2019

Texte intégral

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Jimmy Edward Duncan, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2016-002126

Appeal From Greenville County
Perry H. Gravely, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2019-UP-111
Submitted February 1, 2019 – Filed March 20, 2019

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Taylor Davis Gilliam, of Columbia,
and Jimmy Edward Duncan, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin,
both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted. 1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

LOCKEMY, C.J., and SHORT and MCDONALD, JJ., concur

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.