State v. Buckmon

CourtListener 10150918Scctapp13 févr. 2019

Texte intégral

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Michael Paul Buckmon, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2016-002257

Appeal From Barnwell County
Doyet A. Early, III, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2019-UP-072
Submitted January 1, 2019 – Filed February 13, 2019

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Susan Barber Hackett, of Columbia,
and Michael Paul Buckmon, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Deputy
Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, both of Columbia,
for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

LOCKEMY, C.J., and THOMAS and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.