State v. Mitchum

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Will Rogers Mitchum, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2018-000225

Appeal From Orangeburg County
James R. Barber, III, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2018-UP-469
Submitted November 1, 2018 – Filed December 19, 2018

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defenders Robert M. Pachak and LaNelle
Cantey DuRant, both of Columbia, for Appellant.

Matthew C. Buchanan, of the South Carolina Department
of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia,
for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

KONDUROS, MCDONALD, and HILL, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.