SCDSS v. Bradberry

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,

v.

Lori Bradberry and Larry Kelley, Defendants,

Of whom Lori Bradberry is the Appellant.

In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2018-000583

Appeal From Anderson County
Karen F. Ballenger, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2018-UP-369
Submitted September 7, 2018 – Filed September 18, 2018

AFFIRMED

Robert Mills Ariail, Jr., of Law Office of R. Mills Ariail,
Jr., of Greenville, for Appellant.

James Victor McDade, of Doyle Tate & McDade, PA, of
Anderson, for Respondent.
Samuel Johnston Briggs, of Briggs Law Firm, of
Greenville, for the Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Lori Bradberry appeals the family court's final order terminating
her parental rights to her minor child. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (Supp.
2017). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of
fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354
S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing. Accordingly,
we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Bradberry's counsel.

AFFIRMED.1

KONDUROS, MCDONALD, and HILL, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.